Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
planets_rt [2012/02/28 18:37] – statiaplanets_rt [2012/02/28 19:37] – [28 Feb 2012] statia
Line 14: Line 14:
 **tau_gas.pro:** **tau_gas.pro:**
       - test katherine's new code for ch4 coefficients       - test katherine's new code for ch4 coefficients
-      - update tau gas to take any combination of input param files as strings? This would allow use of new param files, and multiple wavelength ranges to be specified. It would make code more transparent to outside user.+      - update makeparfile take any combination of input param files as strings? This would allow use of new param files, and multiple wavelength ranges to be specified. It would make code more transparent to outside user.
       - incorporate all needed functions/files into one program (e.g. all rayleigh scattering, nh3 absorption, h2h2, etc coefficients covering relevent T and frequency)       - incorporate all needed functions/files into one program (e.g. all rayleigh scattering, nh3 absorption, h2h2, etc coefficients covering relevent T and frequency)
       - NH3 absorption: need to figure out why we'd want to use band models to get k coefficients. Is there a difference between the band model answer and the sromovsky answer? Why? Code in best choice.        - NH3 absorption: need to figure out why we'd want to use band models to get k coefficients. Is there a difference between the band model answer and the sromovsky answer? Why? Code in best choice. 
       - make tau_gas work with structure input and output       - make tau_gas work with structure input and output
 +
 +**tau_haze.pro**
 +      - make into a structure
 +      - allow for particle size distribution for calculating mie scattering
 +      - Lots of questions to answer: how do we specify things? Where are the calculations done? Do we want to fit for g,w, and asym and back out particle properties, or the other way around?
  
 **spectrum fitting:** **spectrum fitting:**

Trace: